▸ Problem · MCP + Laravel
Add MCP to your Laravel SaaS without breaking tenancy.
Agents that can call your product are useful. Agents that can see another tenant are a career-ending bug. This page is for teams who already ship Laravel SaaS and need MCP done the boring, safe way.
The problem
Most MCP demos assume a single user and a toy database. Your app has tenants, roles, billing states, and mutations that must never run twice.
Dropping a chat UI on top of existing controllers skips auth boundaries, audit trails, and structured tool errors. The first production incident is usually a silent cross-tenant read, not a model quality issue.
You need tools that respect the same tenancy and RBAC your HTTP API already enforces, plus logs that prove who called what.
Who this is for
- Teams with a live multi-tenant Laravel product who want Claude or other agents to act inside it.
- Engineering leads who will not ship MCP without tenant isolation, audit logging, and idempotent mutations.
- Founders past the prototype who need a focused sprint, not a rewrite of the whole SaaS.
What you get
- MCP server (or hardening pass) wired into your Laravel app
- Tenant-scoped auth, RBAC checks, and audit logging on every tool call
- Idempotent mutation patterns and structured tool errors agents can handle
- Eval cases for isolation and failure modes, plus handoff docs for your team
- A clear link into the broader AI & MCP package if you want Claude tool use or RAG next
How I approach it
▸ Problem-specific, not a generic playbook
- 01
Map the blast radius
We list which tools read vs write, which tenants they can touch, and which existing policies already cover them. No new surface without an owner.
- 02
Auth and audit first
MCP calls inherit your tenancy and RBAC. Every tool invocation gets an audit row: who, which tenant, which tool, what args, what result.
- 03
Safe mutations
Writes get idempotency keys and structured errors so agents can retry without double charges, double invites, or half-applied state.
- 04
Ship with evals
A small harness covers happy paths and the failure modes that matter (wrong tenant, expired auth, malformed args) before users see them.
Related reading
-
▸ Post
MCP first is the new mobile first
Why tools, skills, and permissions come before another chat UI.
-
▸ Post
MCP auth and audit logging in Laravel
Tenant-safe MCP: who called what, and how you prove it.
-
▸ Post
MCP idempotency for Laravel mutations
Stop double writes when agents retry tool calls.
-
▸ Post
Structured MCP tool errors
Errors agents can parse instead of opaque 500s.
-
▸ Post
API vs MCP
When a classic API is enough, and when MCP earns its keep.
-
▸ Page
AI & MCP Integration package
The engagement that covers Claude, MCP, RAG, and evals.
Questions, answered.
Can you add MCP to an existing Laravel SaaS?
Yes. That is the default. We wire tools into the product you already run, reuse tenancy and policies where they are solid, and only invent new boundaries when the current ones are wrong.
Will agents be able to see other tenants?
Not if we do the job. Tool handlers resolve the acting tenant and user before any query runs. Isolation failures are treated as release blockers, covered in evals.
How long does this take?
A focused MCP surface usually fits a 2-4 week AI integration sprint. Scope is locked after a free discovery call so we are not inventing tools mid-flight.
Do you only support Claude?
Claude is a strong default for tool use. The MCP surface itself stays client-agnostic so other agents can call the same tools later.
Ready to add MCP safely?
Free discovery call. We pick one high-value tool surface and the isolation rules it must never break.